Friday, September 21, 2012
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
New free mobile app New Jersey Criminal and traffic Statutes
New free mobile app
New Jersey Criminal and traffic Statutes
Description
This App contains a detailed list of New Jersey Criminal and
Traffic statutes as well as informative articles by the top attorney in New
Jersey, Mr. Kenneth Vercammen, esq.
Since 1985, KENNETH VERCAMMEN has practiced law in New Jersey
and has an extensive resume of legal success.
Mr. Vercammen has published over 125 legal articles in national
and New Jersey publications on criminal, elder law, probate and litigation
topics. He is a highly regarded lecturer on litigation issues for the American
Bar Association, NJ ICLE, New Jersey State Bar Association and Middlesex County
Bar Association. His articles have been published in noted publications
included New Jersey Law Journal, ABA Law Practice Management Magazine, and New
Jersey Lawyer. He is the Editor in Chief of the American Bar Association Tort
and Insurance Committee Newsletter.
Admitted In NJ, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court.
Friday, August 31, 2012
STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF J.J. A-2357-11T2
STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.
A-2357-11T2
This case required us to determine whether procedural due
process rights must be accorded to an adjudicated juvenile prior
to transfer from a juvenile facility operated by the Juvenile
Justice Commission (JJC) to an adult correctional facility
operated by the Department of Corrections (DOC) pursuant to the
provisions of N.J.S.A. 52:17B-175(e). That statute permits such
transfers of a juvenile "who has reached the age of 16 during
confinement and whose continued presence in the juvenile
facility threatens the public safety, the safety of juvenile
offenders, or the ability of the commission to operate the
program in the manner intended." The State takes the position
that no due process rights of any kind, including notice and an
opportunity to be heard, are required. We disagreed and
reversed.
We concluded that the rehabilitative purposes of the juvenile justice system combined with the importance of the decision in terms of the availability of rehabilitative services to juveniles at issue require due process at least as extensive as that required for prison discipline. See Avant v. Clifford, 67 N.J. 496, 525 (1975). At a minimum, before a juvenile can be transferred to custody of the DOC, there must be written notice of the proposed transfer and the supporting factual basis, an impartial decision maker, an opportunity to be heard and to present opposition, some form of representation, and written findings of fact supporting a decision to proceed with the transfer. 08-28-12
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)